{ "blyg": "0.4", "id": "34gsymp5tgmgpcdakrs94vxhk0", "kind": "thread", "origin": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/", "page": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/2009/microsofts-vision-of-the-future", "author": { "name": "Ben Doherty", "url": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/" }, "created": "2009-03-02T17:15:35Z", "updated": "2009-03-02T17:15:35Z", "version": 1, "content_md": "# microsoft's vision of the future\n\n\n

\n

There is a lot of interesting stuff in here that seems reasonably plausable, seeing how far we've come in the last 10 years.

\n

The majority of things in this video are based on new hardware, none of the software seems all that far fetched. I wonder if it's because we aren't ready for suggestions about significant UI advances, or if they don't predict that things will change much?

\n

However it's important to remember that this is made by the office team, and as such there are a whole load of things that they aren't especially bothered about. It'd be interesting to see how a matching video made by a variety of governments would look.

\n", "content_html": "

microsoft's vision of the future

\n

</embed>

\n

There is a lot of interesting stuff in here that seems reasonably plausable, seeing how far we’ve come in the last 10 years.

\n

The majority of things in this video are based on new hardware, none of the software seems all that far fetched. I wonder if it’s because we aren’t ready for suggestions about significant UI advances, or if they don’t predict that things will change much?

\n

However it’s important to remember that this is made by the office team, and as such there are a whole load of things that they aren’t especially bothered about. It’d be interesting to see how a matching video made by a variety of governments would look.

\n", "content_hash": "sha256:30d4da3cdfe4c40d6ebdf49e7c10aa4e39f2890f6a537690ac5e6cea316c9ca0", "media": [], "changelog": [ { "version": 1, "at": "2009-03-02T17:15:35Z", "note": null } ], "transclusions": [] }