{
 "blyg": "0.4",
 "id": "7dxmrwyhcex1hhg0bvbfe5zk42",
 "kind": "thread",
 "origin": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/",
 "page": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/2009/how-to-disagree",
 "author": {
  "name": "Ben Doherty",
  "url": "https://notionparallax.co.uk/"
 },
 "created": "2009-04-07T14:33:32Z",
 "updated": "2009-04-07T14:33:32Z",
 "version": 1,
 "content_md": "# how to disagree\n\n\n<p>I've been telling a lot of people about this recently, so I thought I'd put up a link to the source.</p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.paulgraham.com/\" title=\"essayist of spectacular insight\">Paul Graham</a> has written an excelent guide to levels of didagreement, and by understanding these it makes it easier to upgrade your responses.</p>\n<p>The general idea is that you can clasify disagreement into</p>\n<li>DH0. Name-calling.</li>\n<li>DH1. Ad Hominem.</li>\n<li>DH2. Responding to Tone.</li>\n<li>DH3. Contradiction.</li>\n<li>DH4. Counterargument.</li>\n<li>DH5. Refutation.</li>\n<li>DH6. Refuting the Central Point.</li>\n<p>I won't go into the details, you can see them worked out with much greater clarity <a href=\"http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html\" target=\"_blank\">here</a></p>\n<p>I recently commented on a BD article, <a href=\"http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3136686\" target=\"_blank\">Concern as English Heritage cites Wikipedia in listing submission</a>, and Verity Bird rebutted me. I've submitted a response, so hopefully that will be moderated soon and if it hasn't fallen off the radar we'll get a bit of a debate going!</p>\n<p>My response level is currently about a DH4 though, so hopefully i'll get to DH6 in the not too distant future!</p>\n",
 "content_html": "<h1>how to disagree</h1>\n<p>I’ve been telling a lot of people about this recently, so I thought I’d put up a link to the source.</p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.paulgraham.com/\" title=\"essayist of spectacular insight\">Paul Graham</a> has written an excelent guide to levels of didagreement, and by understanding these it makes it easier to upgrade your responses.</p>\n<p>The general idea is that you can clasify disagreement into</p>\n<li>\n  <p>DH0. Name-calling.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n  <li>\n    <p>DH1. Ad Hominem.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n    <li>\n      <p>DH2. Responding to Tone.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n      <li>\n        <p>DH3. Contradiction.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n        <li>\n          <p>DH4. Counterargument.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n          <li>\n            <p>DH5. Refutation.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n            <li>\n              <p>DH6. Refuting the Central Point.&lt;/li&gt;</p>\n              <p>I won’t go into the details, you can see them worked out with much greater clarity <a href=\"http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html\" target=\"_blank\">here</a></p>\n              <p>I recently commented on a BD article, <a href=\"http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=3136686\" target=\"_blank\">Concern as English Heritage cites Wikipedia in listing submission</a>, and Verity Bird rebutted me. I’ve submitted a response, so hopefully that will be moderated soon and if it hasn’t fallen off the radar we’ll get a bit of a debate going!</p>\n              <p>My response level is currently about a DH4 though, so hopefully i’ll get to DH6 in the not too distant future!</p>\n            </li>\n          </li>\n        </li>\n      </li>\n    </li>\n  </li>\n</li>\n",
 "content_hash": "sha256:fd5723ef4457a796933b8ff5b6837ccadac450ce7196ba12195cd60a2688bd1a",
 "media": [],
 "changelog": [
  {
   "version": 1,
   "at": "2009-04-07T14:33:32Z",
   "note": null
  }
 ],
 "transclusions": []
}